Title: Atomic exchange restrictions between transaction circuits: PTLC -based swaps study

Annotation

The atomic exchange is an essential technology that allows you to quickly change with assets in multiple blockchain networks. However, the integration of PTLC schemes (permutation and transformation) based on cryptocurrency schemes (PTLC) in atomic swaps raised concerns about their compatibility with certain networks, such as Ethereum. The purpose of this article is to investigate whether Ethereum exists in PTLC -based exchange options.

Introduction

In recent years, he has paid considerable attention to the atomic swaps of the mutual chain, as its potential to facilitate active efficient transfer between different blockchain networks. PTLC schemes for this purpose offer a unique approach to exchange atoms using permutation techniques and conversion to convert one cryptocurrency to another. Despite the promising nature, there were concerns about PTLC -based swap compatibility with certain Ethereum -compatible cryptocurrencies.

Bottom

PTLC is a type of cryptocurrency that uses advanced cryptographic methods to provide transactions from safe and effective cross patients. Using permutation and modification methods, PTLC schemes can convert one cryptocurrency to another, thus facilitating atomic swaps between multiple blockchain networks. For example, PTLC -based swaps can be used to convert Bitcoin (BTC) to Ethereum Classic (etc) or vice -versa.

Ethereum marker economy

Ethereum is a platform that supports a wide range of tokens, including ERC-20 and ERC-721 actives. The symbolic economy in Ethereum is designed to allow these digital assets to be created, distributed and commerce. However, when it comes to PTLC -based swaps, the economy of Ethereum markers is becoming an obstacle.

Theoretical restrictions

To investigate if there is PTLC -based swaps, we need to check the theoretical restrictions of this technology. From a cryptographic point of view, PTLC schemes depend on special permutation and conversion rules that are not guaranteed with the Ethereum marker economy. This is because Blockchain Ethereum has undergone significant changes since the introduction of PTLC schemes that introduced new primitive and cryptographic mechanisms.

Conclusion

In conclusion, although PTLC -based swaps are theoretically possible, they may not be possible for Ethereum for use due to its complex symbolic and primitive cryptographic economy incompatible. To completely explore PTLC -based swaps on Ethereum, more research is needed to determine if these schemes can be customized to work in the current network architecture.

Subsequent research instructions

To avoid this lack of knowledge, more studies should focus on:

• Study of new permutation and conversion rules, compatible with the Ethereum marker economy.

• PTLC -Based Exchange Alternative Architecture Research, which can meet Ethereum’s specific requirements.

• Developing a deeper understanding of the cryptographic mechanisms that are in the heart of PTLC schemes to better understand their restrictions.

Restrictions and open questions

While this study identifies theoretically restrictions on Ethereum PTLC -based swaps, there are still several open questions:

• How do existing PTLC schemes adapt to Ethereum’s sophisticated token economy?

• What is the effect of these PTLC -based swaps?

• There are alternative solutions that can overcome restrictions on the PTLC scheme in Ethereum?

By addressing these issues and studying more research instructions, we can get a deeper understanding of PTLC -based swaps and totally use their potential.